Provision in case
+
of successive
transactions.
6.
3.
22
consideration and (save in so far as such agree-
ment or other instrument otherwise provides).
at the cost of the assignee or other the person
lawfully requiring the same the property to which
such assignment relates in the form which would
have been directed by the Court prior to the
Japanese occupation in a successful action for the
specific performance of such an agreement.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the
preceding sub-section, unless the Japanese
assignment otherwise provides or the context
thereof otherwise requires, a reference to a
house or building in such an assignment shall
be deemed to include the land enjoyed with such
house or building at the date of the execution
of such assignment, together with all rights,
members, easements or appurtenances belonging
or appertaining to such land, house or building.
(1) Where any property, or part thereof, has
during the Japanese occupation been the subject
matter of successive Japanese assignments, then,
the assignee under the last of such assignments
Lay at his own expense require the assignor on
the first of such assignments to assign and the
assignor on the second and any subsequent assign-
ment to confirm unto the assignee under the last
of such assignments or as he may direct the
property or part thereof, as the case may be,
the subject matter of the last of such assign-
ments.
(2) Where any property was assigned by way of
mortgage before the Japanese occupation and the
mortgage debt has been lawfully discharged, then
if the property has been the subject matter of
i
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.